iPhone 17 Pro Max Review: Fast Performance, Better Speakers, A Centered Face, and Average Battery Life

By Michael Hansen, 13 October, 2025

Member of the AppleVis Editorial Team

For 2025, Apple introduced 4 new iPhone models (not including the iPhone 16e, which I consider to have been from the previous generation). Each model offers something different: The iPhone 17 is the base model (for now, anyways), the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are the mainline upgrade options, and the thinnest-iPhone-ever iPhone Air is either deeply compromised or the most innovative design Apple has ever shipped--depending on how you look at it.

My previous phone was the iPhone 16 Pro Max, a device that I was happy with though it was imperfect. In particular, the sound from the device's speakers--something very important to me as a blind user of VoiceOver--left a lot to be desired.

Within hours of setting up the iPhone 17 Pro Max on launch day, I shared some very early initial impressions of the device. Now that I've been using the iPhone 17 Pro Max for a little under a month, I wanted to expand on my thoughts a bit more and answer some of the questions that initial article could not.

For the 2025-2026 cycle, Apple gave the Pro iPhones a new design and a change of materials. The frame of the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max are made from a single piece of aluminum, and this shows in how the device feels in the hand. On the iPhone 16 Pro Max, the titanium frame feels noticeably smoother than the glass back of the device; in contrast, the sides and back of the iPhone 17 Pro Max feel remarkably similar, to the point that I really had to carefully run my fingers across the back of the device to feel where the aluminum unibody ended and the glass back began. This new design is a subtle tactile difference that, to me, makes the iPhone 17 Pro Max feel more cohesive.

While the aluminum unibody is a subtle design change that many may not notice, the 'plateau' is anything but. Introduced on the iPhone 17 Pro/Max and also the iPhone Air, the plateau is a raised rectangular area on the top-back of the phone that houses the cameras, processor, and other components. Whereas on the iPhone 15 and 16 Pro/Max the cameras were housed in a small square-shaped area immediately surrounding the cameras, on the 17 Pro/Max the plateau extends across nearly the entire width and top-third of the device. While this isn't a huge change in terms of overall device thickness, the plateau is left uncovered by at least some Apple-branded cases (I cannot comment firsthand on anything else); leaving a rather large portion of the back of the device unprotected. While I suspect that this is because some camera components are located on the opposite side of the plateau, this is nevertheless disappointing for those who, like me, keep their devices in a case. And of course, there will be no setting this or any other modern iPhone flat on a table, period.

One of my biggest pain points about the iPhone 16 Pro Max was the speakers. At low volumes, the iPhone 16 Pro Max's speakers sounded flat; with okay mids and both little base and little high end; whereas at high volumes, the speakers had a lot of base and high end, but comparatively less in the mid range. Apple has, for the most part, addressed this issue with the iPhone 17 Pro Max. The bottom speaker (which is now located on the bottom-left of the device) is much more consistent across all volume ranges, particularly at lower volume levels. Side-by-side, there is a noticeable difference between the iPhone 16 Pro Max and the iPhone 17 Pro Max; with the iPhone 17 Pro Max sounding 'clearer' and 'fuller'. On reflection I still think that the speaker on the iPhone 16e has more bass than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (and this is saying something, because the iPhone 16e costs half as much as the iPhone 17 Pro Max at the time of writing), but I unfortunately only had the iPhone 16e on loan and thus cannot now compare it to the 17 Pro Max firsthand. Regardless of whether or not the iPhone 16e's speakers are really better than those on the iPhone 17 Pro Max, the differences I am talking about are minimal. If like me you were dissatisfied by the speakers on the iPhone 16 Pro Max, I think you will definitely notice an improvement with this year's model.

Performance on the iPhone 17 Pro Max has been better by leaps and bounds, and this is coming from someone who upgrades every year and thus has seen my fair share of new devices running the latest OS. As a blind user, I measure performance by how quickly VoiceOver responds to touch inputs and how quickly I can swipe through elements on the screen. And the iPhone 17 Pro Max excels in both.

VoiceOver is incredibly responsive to touch gestures, even when using voices which are not the lowest of latency. When doing the initial device setup, I noticed right away how much more responsive the default 'Samantha Compact' voice was; with VoiceOver responding near-instantaneously to touch inputs and no lag when swiping around the screen. While your mileage may vary (Siri Voice 4, for example, still has a delay when navigating), my past experience using the 'Samantha Compact' voice has been that it is middle-of-the-road in terms of responsiveness; suggesting that something about the new phones (either the A19-series processor or the increase to 12GB of ram on all models except the base iPhone 17) is helping with VoiceOver performance.

Another welcome but unexpected feature of the iPhone 17 series is the front-facing Center Stage Camera, which automatically centers your face while on FaceTime calls. I had the opportunity to test this recently while on a call with my mother, and the feedback I got was that I was perfectly centered. For someone who cannot see, this feature is huge and tremendously helpful, as I have no way otherwise of knowing if I am centered other than to guess or ask the person I am on the call with (the latter of which I am not likely to do). The Center Stage Camera also works when taking selfies and videos, though I cannot comment firsthand on how well it works in those situations. Similarly, other camera functionality is simply beyond my use case, and thus, my ability to offer an informed opinion. And unfortunately, I have no firsthand information on whether or not Aira works better on devices with upgraded cameras (though I did try to find this out).

If I have one complaint about the iPhone 17 Pro Max, it is that so far, I have not noticed a meaningful improvement in battery life over the previous-generation phone; when everything I have read suggests that I should be. According to Apple, the iPhone 17 Pro Max offers up to 39 hours of video playback and 35 hours of streamed video playback on a charge. Armed with these expectations, I had very high hopes.

On most days, I usually finished the day at somewhere between 55 and 60% charge; with 58% seeming to be the number I ended at most often. The lowest I recall getting my iPhone 17 Pro Max to so far is 41%.

While these numbers are very good, they are by no means extraordinary for a Pro Max model. In fact, when I wrote my review of the iPhone 16 Pro Max at this time last year, I noted that the lowest I had gotten that phone, with about the same amount of use and similar usage pattern, was 53% charge. If we exclude the day I got the iPhone 17 Pro Max's battery down to 41% (a day which included playing a Facebook live video of a state government news conference for around an hour, which undoubtedly drained the battery quite a bit), I still have ended multiple days below last year's 53% threshold. And this is with display brightness at 0%, iOS 26's Adaptive Power settings enabled, and no changes made to Background App Refresh settings.

To be sure, battery life on the iPhone 17 Pro Max is very good. And when compared to an iPhone 16 Pro Max running iOS 26, there is a definite improvement. (Put another way: After installing iOS 26 on my iPhone 16 Pro Max, I noticed a decrease in overall battery life.) But if we compare out-of-box battery life between an iPhone 17 Pro Max running iOS 26 and last year's iPhone 16 Pro Max running iOS 18 (that is, two devices running the original OS versions they were shipped with), real-world battery life is about the same year-over-year with no meaningful gains. And that is a bit of a disappointment, as Apple's marketing had me expecting something significantly better on a grand scale. Is it good? Yes. Is it good for a Pro Max phone? Yes. Is it the best battery life in an iPhone? Yes. It just isn't an improvement over what I saw last year when my iPhone 16 Pro Max was new.


At some point every year, I inevitably hear the question (either on AppleVis or in person), "What iPhone should I get?" That question is fascinating and could probably be an entire article in and of itself (and maybe one day, it will be). In the meantime, below are some thoughts:

While I have not yet spent any time with the iPhone 17 or iPhone 17 Pro, my educated guess is that either model, or the aforementioned iPhone 17 Pro Max, will serve you well. Due to the single-speaker design and relatively less battery life of the iPhone Air, I cannot in good conscience recommend it unless you already know that is the phone you want and are okay with the compromises.

For most people, I think the base iPhone 17 is likely to be more than enough. The iPhone 17 has a 6.3-inch screen and offers up to 30 hours of video playback and 27 hours of streamed video playback, which is leaps and bounds above even last year's iPhone 16 Pro. My only hesitations about the iPhone 17 are based more on 'maybes' rather than facts: the iPhone 17 only has 8GB of ram, and the iPhone 17 Pro/Max have the Pro versions of the A19 processor and upgraded cameras. Will any of those things really matter in day-to-day use for the average person? Maybe, but more likely, probably not.

If you know you want a Pro iPhone, your choice will largely depend on which size of device you want and how much you are able to pay. The iPhone 17 Pro has a 6.3-inch screen and offers up to 33 hours of video playback and up to 30 hours of streamed video playback; whereas the iPhone 17 Pro Max has a 6.9-inch screen and offers up to 39 hours of video playback and up to 35 hours of streamed video playback. Besides device/screen size and battery life, everything else is the same between the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. Both phones are likely to be excellent. As the saying goes, "What kind of ice cream do you want? Chocolate or vanilla? They're both good."

Did you upgrade your iPhone this year? Are you thinking of doing so? Do you have questions about something I did not cover? Let me know in the comments!

Options

Comments

By emperor limitless on Monday, October 13, 2025 - 21:04

to give a reference I had an iphone 11 pro max for 2 yeaars, then switched to the base model iphone 15, and then I switched to the 17 pro max. Me hearing you say battery life is average blew my mind, like yes apple claimes but eh apple claimes a lot of nonsense so it doesn't surprise me, but ending the day with half battery most of the time is just insane when my 15 barely got me through half the day. So... Average? No way.
question. Do you own the esim only version? Because the esim only version has a bigger battery. Though yes, from what you say my battery life is consistant to yours. Assuming, of course, that you use your phone for at least 8 hours a day like I do. LOL.

By Brian on Monday, October 13, 2025 - 21:44

Hi Michael,

Thanks for writing this review. It's good to get comparisons to last year's models. One thing though. I realize why you mention them, but folks should never count on battery benchmarks. There are way too many factors that can increase and more importantly, decrease The overall battery up time on any given day.
Still, the 17 Pro Max sounds like a solid device.

Thank you again for writing this. 😆

By Singer Girl on Monday, October 13, 2025 - 21:49

I upgraded to an iPhone 15 from my SE 2022. So yes it’s not the latest and greatest phone but the thing is I wanted a phone that had to switch. I also wanted a phone that I knew was going to be pink. And I got both things. I got the highest storage capacity. I’m very happy with this. I got it August 13 of this year so I’ll be keeping this for a long while. I kept my iPhone SE 2022 as an iPod. I’m glad I did because that’s the last phone for the home button. Also, I never had a chance to get an iPod so this is the next best thing. Great review. I did have one question though. Does that phone comfortably in one hand or do you have to use it with two hands. I really don’t like having a phone any bigger. I hope this is the biggest don’t have to get a phone. But I think if I stick with the standard models, I should be fine. I can use this phone comfortably one hand and still fit in a pocket.

By João Santos on Monday, October 13, 2025 - 22:56

I upgraded from an iPhone SE 2020 that never had its battery replaced so I was bound to notice a difference to a brand new 17 Pro, however I wasn't really expecting how insane that difference would feel to me, and to give an example, I spent 90 minutes on the phone with several departments in my carrier in a single phone call, and at the end the battery had only dropped 5%, all this in speakerphone mode and with the always-on display preventing the phone from locking itself mid-call so muting the microphone never required going through a FaceID authentication process. While I understand that the always-on display has been a feature of pro models for quite some time, this was all new to me so I was personally blown away.

I agree with the snappiness of the Samantha Compact voice though, which is the only voice that I use on all my Apple products, and I actually like the bass-heavy profile of the speakers in this model compared to what I was used to with the SE 2020 which I honestly find impressive for speakers in a device with these dimensions. The only thing that I don't like is the camera plateau, which as I mentioned on the other thread, makes the cameras 3 extrusions out of another extrusion which makes little sense to me as I'd rather have a proper box-shaped brick with a beefy battery filling all the empty space inside.

I also ordered some accessories along with the iPhone, among which were a Mophie travel MagSafe charger that folds like a thick wallet, comes with a travel pouch, USB-c charging cable, and power supply, and can simultaneously wirelessly charge my iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods, in addition to making it possible to use the iPhone as a Continuity Camera for my Mac Studio that has no built-in camera or microphone of its own for obvious reasons, and generally compensates for the lack of flatness resulting from the camera plateau and the camera bumps themselves. Another accessory that I bought was a SATECHI MagSafe wallet that can hold up to two credit card sized cards and some paper bills in addition to working as a stand for the Iphone itself, but honestly don't find myself using it that much. Both of these devices seem to be designed with the dimensions of the 17 Pro and its camera plateau in mind so I cannot tell how well they would fare with the 17 Pro Max.

By Gar on Tuesday, October 14, 2025 - 02:38

Hello all,
Firstly, I will apologize in advance because this post is part my asking for opinions, part... maybe, me talking to myself.
I've had an iPhone 15 Pro since December of 2023. The phone itself has served me well in all the ways I've needed it to, for the most part. The trouble is, I am what one might call a heavy user. I usually end up having to charge it at least once per day, in addition to letting it charge overnight, though it's usually closer to the end of the day most of the time. At the moment, my battery health is 85%, and I honestly can't decide if I want to replace the battery now, wait a little until it drops to 80% health, or if I just want to ditch this phone and get the 17 Pro Max for the most battery possible. Granted, I won't be replacing it right away as I have other things to pay for... but soon, in a few months at least, if I do go in that direction.
I am having other issues, but I don't know what they're related to as there are a number of parts to them. Depending on the response I get I might create a new forum topic specifically for this. Mostly these issues surround bluetooth. It seems that when I have my Phonak Audeo Infineo hearing aids connected to my phone, my Keychron bluetooth Keyboard has a very hard time connecting to it as well. Most of the time, as long as my hearing aids are connected, my keyboard will immediately refuse to connect. When I switch the keyboard from device 1 to device 2 which is what it was paired to my phone as, usually nothing happens. If I try to get my phone to connect to the keyboard, my phone immediately throws the standard couldn't connect message. Make sure the device is turned on, in range, and so on. However, if I turn bluetooth off and on again, and I do not allow my phone to connect to my hearing aids, it is able to connect to my keyboard with no issues. Then I can connect it to my hearing aids. As someone who uses my phone with an external keyboard regularly, this is... frustrating, and I don't know where the issue is. I have tried to unpair and re-pair all the devices in question, and across several such attempts the problem still remains.
Sidenote, don't ever try to connect an external keyboard to your phone via USB-C as, apparently, the phone will take that as a queue to charge the keyboard. It drains the battery extremely fast.
I'd appreciate any advice/answers folks have.

By SSWFTW on Tuesday, October 14, 2025 - 05:05

I know someone right above says that battery usage can fluctuate drastically based upon the user and what they do with their phone. I just wanted to add my two cents just in case someone is reading this in order to make a purchasing decision.
I to find the battery pretty amazing. Possibly slightly less better than when I had the 15+ but I still blows me away in comparison to the 15 pro. It easily easily drains half as quickly as that phone drain for me
I love voiceover responsiveness with Samantha And I like the size of the screen somehow.