More Suspicion of censorship

Hello Michael,

Thank you for your email. I have read it carefully.
I want to be clear about why I am concerned by your characterisation of the post as containing “sexually offensive content.” The post did not contain sexual imagery, sexual acts, or sexual commentary authored by me. It consisted of an AI-generated description of a still from a mainstream television series (The L Word), alongside contextual explanation of a widely circulated meme originating from lesbian communities themselves.
The purpose of the post was to demonstrate and evaluate AI image-description capability in response to a question from a blind user about whether AI systems can recognise and explain memes without prior context. It was an accessibility and assistive-technology discussion, not an attempt to promote or endorse the meme.
I fully accept that AppleVis may decide that references to dating, sexuality, or culturally specific memes — even when described neutrally and for analytical purposes — fall outside what you consider appropriate for the platform. That is a moderation boundary you are entitled to set.
However, describing the post as “sexually offensive” or “potentially harassing toward a particular people group” does not accurately reflect its content or intent, and I find that framing troubling.
Given this, I do not feel comfortable continuing to contribute material under these terms. Please proceed with removing the two blog posts I previously offered for publication.

Regards,

Cass Flux