Parallels or Fusion

I wouldn't say parallels is inaccessible, exactly. If you use ocr you'll be fine once the vm is set up, and by that I mean just press one or 2, 3 buttons at the most with ocr, wait and you'll be good to go. Some of the settings you will need ocr if you want to access them like the table in keyboard shortcuts but other than that settings are accessible. with vmware fusion having the same caveat with arm windows. If you don't have an adaptor, you'll need to use ocr or ask for sighted help to get passed the first instalation phaze because no audio unless you have a adaptor; both have their, buts, if you will. Tbh fusion has gone downhill since broadcom's acquisition. I.e, bugs don't get fixed such as the, login items bug; it'll trigger practically every time you launch fusion, you cannot check for updates from the software itself, you have to do it manually. Now. Will parallels give you anything fusion doesn't have... Yes. You'll be able to access folders from the mac from the vm side. Fusion has this if using intel macs but since apple silicon that's no longer the case. Other than that though? Not really. I've personally noticed parallels be way quicker at things like starting vms, resuming and suspending than fusion but, that's not a big deal.
In the end it’s your choice, just be aware that both have their ups and downs. Given the dddirection fusion's going though? I'd say parallels might be the better alternative in my opinion. In any case parallels has a 14 day free trial, so you lose nothing by trying it if you want to do so you can have the most information before deciding. You've also got utm which, cant say much about that one as I haven't used it in a long time but its yet another one you can explore, if the above options, fusion or parallels don't meet your needs.